Liverpool were the Premier League club worst hit by hidden foreign exchange (FX) fees during the summer transfer window, according to new data from borderless currency platform Glyde.
With English clubs spending more than 拢1.7bn on players from European leagues, the analysis found that 鈥榮kimming鈥� by legacy FX brokers cost the top flight more than 拢22.5m between 16th June and 1st September.
The reigning Premier League champions lost more than 拢3.6m to hidden FX charges – more than any other Premier League side – according to the data.
Newly promoted Sunderland were the second-most affected, with losses for The Black Cats exceeding 拢2.2m as they leaned heavily on signings from top leagues in Europe outside of the UK, said Glyde.聽
The findings highlight how brokers add mark-ups to exchange rates, known as skimming or FX scalping, that can snowball into millions in hidden costs when applied to multi-million-pound transfers.
Brentford Strides into new Premier League season with US deal
Major signings littered the top 10 worst-affected deals, with Liverpool鈥檚 new Bundesliga arrivals Florian Wirtz (拢1.5m) and Hugo Ekitike (拢1m) resulting in a combined skim of more than 拢2.5m.
The club鈥檚 deadline day British record 拢125m signing of Alexander Isak has also reportedly seen nearly 拢1.7m skimmed off by FX systems.
Elsewhere, Benjamin 艩e拧ko鈥檚 move to Manchester United (拢950k) and Nick Woltemade鈥檚 transfer to Newcastle (拢897k) were also hit.
鈥淔ootball transfers are negotiated down to the last detail, but what clubs don鈥檛 see is the hidden cost eating away at their budgets when they move money across borders,鈥� said Ellis Taylor, CEO and co-founder of Glyde.
鈥淭he Isak transfer alone saw nearly 拢1.7m skimmed off by outdated FX systems. That is money that should be going into performance on the pitch, not lining the pockets of brokers.
鈥淕lyde was set up to help SMEs by providing transparency and fair exchange, not to profit from them.聽
鈥淲hat this data shows is that the same FX broker 鈥榙ark arts鈥� hurting small businesses also scale up to affect organisations of every size, even mammoth football clubs.鈥�
The FCA has criticised hidden FX mark-ups, but the FinTech鈥檚 data suggests that the practice is still widespread.聽
Transfers involving GBP are the hardest hit, with average hidden skims of 1.3%, compared with 0.9% for the Euro.
Premier League clubs hit with biggest FX losses:
| Ranking | Club | Skim% | Transfer fees (拢) | Total skim (拢) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liverpool | 0.013 | 279,500,000 | 3,633,500 |
| 2 | Sunderland | 0.013 | 169,600,000 | 2,204,800 |
| 3 | Arsenal | 0.013 | 127,500,000 | 1,657,500 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 0.013 | 120,500,000 | 1,566,500 |
| 5 | Tottenham | 0.013 | 111,300,000 | 1,446,900 |
| 6 | Man City | 0.013 | 110,300,000 | 1,433,900 |
| 7 | Nottm Forest | 0.013 | 104,950,000 | 1,364,350 |
| 8 | Newcastle | 0.013 | 103,300,000 | 1,342,900 |
| 9 | Man Utd | 0.013 | 91,900,000 | 1,194,700 |
| 10 | Wolves | 0.013 | 88,500,000 | 1,150,500 |